W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > November 2009

[Bug 8404] Refocus the figure element back to being a figure

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:02:55 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1NFEKd-0004pv-8M@wiggum.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8404





--- Comment #9 from Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>  2009-11-30 22:02:54 ---
(In reply to comment #8)

> 
> However, if there is a wish to be less restrictive then allowing math or table
> doesn't seem horrible.Docbook allows for informal equations or tables in a
> figure. As HTML reasonably lacks formal and informal forms of table or math it
> seems reasonable to allow both in a figure. For example a figure might contain
> a graph, with a corresponding equation or table as part of the figure.
> 

I think the HTML equivalent of a DocBook informal table would be one with no
<caption>. I think all HTML+MathML equations would be the equivalent of DocBook
informal. So they should probably both be allowed.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 30 November 2009 22:03:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:05 UTC