W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > November 2009

[Bug 8404] Refocus the figure element back to being a figure

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:29:27 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1NFDoF-0001SJ-SL@wiggum.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8404


Gavin Carothers <gavin@carothers.name> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |gavin@carothers.name




--- Comment #8 from Gavin Carothers <gavin@carothers.name>  2009-11-30 21:29:27 ---
Looking at another mark-up language known for being far more restrictive then
HTML, Docbook http://docbook.org/tdg/en/html/figure.html we find that figure
can be considered to contain almost everything, EXCEPT a formal table or formal
equation. Seems reasonable then to allow almost any content except for a table
or math element. 

However, if there is a wish to be less restrictive then allowing math or table
doesn't seem horrible.Docbook allows for informal equations or tables in a
figure. As HTML reasonably lacks formal and informal forms of table or math it
seems reasonable to allow both in a figure. For example a figure might contain
a graph, with a corresponding equation or table as part of the figure.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 30 November 2009 21:29:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:05 UTC