W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > November 2009

[Bug 8329] should object/@code be omitted from list of obsolete attributes?

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:42:42 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1NAivq-0005kZ-3d@wiggum.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8329


Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID




--- Comment #2 from Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org>  2009-11-18 11:42:41 ---
OK, further data which instead suggests that there is a (small) case for
including "code on object elements" as obsolete

<Philip`>
http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/?%3C!DOCTYPE%20html%3E%0A%3Cbody%3E%0A%3Cobject%20id%3Do%3E%3C%2Fobject%3E%3Cscript%3Edocument.getElementById%28%27o%27%29.code%3D1%3C%2Fscript%3E
- hmm, browsers support it
<Philip`> http://google.com/codesearch?q=%3Cobject%5B%5E%3E%5D%2A%5Cscode%3D -
some people use it

so, I will move this to resolved/invalid


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 18 November 2009 11:42:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:05 UTC