- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:28:37 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8329
Summary: should object/@code be omitted from list of obsolete
attributes?
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
URL: http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/obsolete.html#non-
conforming-features
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: HTML5 spec bugs
AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org
ReportedBy: mike@w3.org
QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: ian@hixie.ch, mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org
The "Non-conforming features" section of the spec lists "code on object
elements" as an obsolete attribute. But as far as I can tell, the code
attribute -- while widely used on the applet element -- was never valid on the
object element in any version of HTML and does not seem to be used in any
significant amount of existing Web content. See, for example,
http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/mama-plug-ins/#object
So, I'm wondering whether the "code on object elements" line should be
removed from that section (so that, e.g., conformance-checker developers don't
feel any need to do any special reporting for that case).
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 18 November 2009 11:28:39 UTC