- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:28:37 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8329 Summary: should object/@code be omitted from list of obsolete attributes? Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: PC URL: http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/obsolete.html#non- conforming-features OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: HTML5 spec bugs AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org ReportedBy: mike@w3.org QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: ian@hixie.ch, mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org The "Non-conforming features" section of the spec lists "code on object elements" as an obsolete attribute. But as far as I can tell, the code attribute -- while widely used on the applet element -- was never valid on the object element in any version of HTML and does not seem to be used in any significant amount of existing Web content. See, for example, http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/mama-plug-ins/#object So, I'm wondering whether the "code on object elements" line should be removed from that section (so that, e.g., conformance-checker developers don't feel any need to do any special reporting for that case). -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 18 November 2009 11:28:39 UTC