- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 13:38:07 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8094 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED Summary|It's not very clear whether |It's not very clear whether |or not this includes word- |or not this includes word- |style, squiggly-line |style, squiggly-line, as- | |you-type spell-checking. | |This feature sounds like | |more of a manual spell-check | |done after a body of text is | |completed. Should a spell- | |check option be added to the | |CSS spec for Summary|as-you-type spell-checking. | |This feature sounds like | |more of a manual spell-check| |done after a body of text is| |completed. Should a spell- | |check option be added to the| |CSS spec for | --- Comment #1 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2009-12-08 13:38:07 --- EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Partially Accepted Change Description: see diff given below Rationale: It's not supposed to constrain the browsers to any one type of spelling checking. I've added a note to this effect. I don't know whether we should add stuff to CSS for this; I recommend contacting that working group to follow up on that suggestion. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 8 December 2009 13:38:18 UTC