- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:49:03 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7374
Remy Sharp <remy@remysharp.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |remy@remysharp.com
--- Comment #2 from Remy Sharp <remy@remysharp.com> 2009-08-20 07:49:02 ---
As an author, the legacy issues linked to the <legend> element are too big to
overcome (or at least so far in all our testing), and the <figure> and
<details> are valuable additions to the markup language.
I would like to see support from vendors to find/propose an alternative to the
<legend> element as this will work across all browsers. I've been through a
lot of the tests (Bruce references my blog posts) so it's safe to say even
fixing <legend> in future browsers sadly isn't enough to allow authors to start
using <figure> and <details>
What, if any, are the objects to the two suggestions Bruce has?
> Alternatively a new element - <description>? <c>? should be specified.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 20 August 2009 07:49:12 UTC