- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2009 23:06:37 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7145
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #2 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2009-08-09 23:06:37 ---
This has been discussed a number of times. For an overview of the topic, please
see these e-mails:
http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2009-March/018888.html
http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2009-August/021745.html
It's not clear why this:
<p>Dolly was born in <time>2009</time>.</p>
...is any better than this:
<p>Dolly was born in 2009.</p>
It's not like the year is going to be used in calendar data or localised in
special ways.
Without clear use cases, I don't intend to change the spec here.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 9 August 2009 23:06:46 UTC