- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:16:54 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5773
--- Comment #32 from Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> 2008-06-25 12:16:53 ---
> So, percent encoding the url of a file and providing target='_download' would
...percent-escaping the UTF-8 encoding of a file name...
> provide complete international support then right? Adding a separate filename
> attribute or an optional _download('filename') might provide authors with more
> flexibility to create a default filename different from the resource’s served
> filename, but it would not be required for l18N support? I'm asking because I'm
> still trying to understand this issue.
Yes, I think that's correct.
> And again I want to reiterate, that I'm not proposing this because of a
> deficiency in rfc 2231 support, rather I think we need support for this in HTML
> itself independent of HTTP solutions.
Understood. I just think UAs should support RFC 2231 *first*, before focusing
on new stuff (2 out of the 4 major UAs get it right, after all).
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2008 12:17:29 UTC