- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 07:26:21 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5773 --- Comment #27 from Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> 2008-06-23 07:26:21 --- (In reply to comment #23) > (in reply to comment #22 and #21) > I think a target='_download' would probably be a decent solution. I'm not as > clear why authors need control over the filename (either in http disposition > headers or here). I can see why an email MIME part needs to attach filesystem > metadata to an included file since there's no other place for that metadata. > However, in the case of http or other URL-based delivery, all of that > filesystem metadata is available already. The issue of providing a different > filename might be a nice enhancement, but hardly a necessity. The only available information for the filename would be the URI. That isn't sufficient in all cases, as: - the URI namespace may not be defined in a way that allows exposing the filename (such as, when using numeric identifiers), - there's no reliable way to map non-ASCII characters (we can't rely on non-ASCII characters to be encoded in UTF-8) -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 23 June 2008 07:26:56 UTC