- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 03:51:39 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5744 --- Comment #30 from Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu> 2008-06-21 03:51:38 --- (In reply to comment #28) > It's also not clear that > HTML5 would even be the appropriate place to spec it (my personal opinion, > fwiw, is that it would not be). it is part of html 4.01: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/intro/intro.html#h-2.1.2 it is part of the current html 5 draft: http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-html5-20080610/history.html#scroll-to-fragid i think it would be bad design to not include fragment identifiers in the html5 spec (in their html4 form or an improved form). html is a document format intended for publishing and navigating hypertext, and factoring out fragment identifiers into the media type registration only would send a very clear message that they are regarded as add-on, and not as an integral part of the spec. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 21 June 2008 03:52:12 UTC