- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 01:58:01 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5768 --- Comment #1 from Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org> 2008-06-21 01:58:01 --- (In reply to comment #0) > The treatment of resources sourced from <link rel=icon> should probably same as > though from an <img> element: http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/embedded0.html#the-img > > Philip Taylor did a bit of research on existing usage of content-types with > favicons and found enough inconsistencies to warrant further study: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2008Jun/0242.html > > This issue was originally discussed in #whatwg: > http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20080618#l-40 > It's not clear to me that this has been resolved to the satisfaction of the submittor. Shawn, can you please respond to indicate if it has been or not? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 21 June 2008 01:58:36 UTC