- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:50:52 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5776
Summary: Authors need more control over handling of linked
resources
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
URL: http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/LinkAndEmbeddingAttributes
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Spec proposals
AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org
ReportedBy: rob@robburns.com
QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: ian@hixie.ch, mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org
* Authors may want to treat a resource as a type for embedding or linking
different than the resource’s intrinsic type
* HTTP attempted to provide some solutions especially for tailoring the
processing of content to an authors needs, however:
- because of the history of server-side and client-side http UAs, the
content-type headers no longer serve this purpose
- any HTTP solution may not be available to all HTML authors: i.e., those
who have no access to configure the server or are not using an HTTP server for
delivery
- providing an HTML solution permits a single resource with only one
representation to be processed in various ways while an HTTP solution requires
either duplicating the resource or providing a symbolic or hard linking the
same resource to provide different HTTP header metadata which may require
additional network traffic as well
- new headers could be added to HTTP, but it still would not provide an
HTML internal solution
Some attribute allowing authors to fine-tune the handling would be ideal. For
example an HTML tutorial might include side-by-side iframe elements loading the
same resource: one as text/html and one as text/plain.
(see http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/LinkAndEmbeddingAttributes for evolving
solution proposals)
[author issue, minor added implementation, attribute only solution]
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 20 June 2008 12:51:26 UTC