- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 07:47:37 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5773 --- Comment #7 from Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> 2008-06-20 07:47:36 --- (In reply to comment #6) > Julian: Historically I've gotten into trouble whenever I've made specs say that > other orthogonal specs are required, so I'm very hesitant to mention that. As far as I can tell, the situation is like this: - all major UAs support C-D in principle - the experts seem to agree that RFC 2231 applies, and is what needs to be implemented - there's also agreement that RFC 2231, when applied to HTTP, is overly complex, and a profile (UTF-8, no line folding) is totally sufficient - as far as I recall, FF and Opera get this right; IE and Safari don't (see <https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15287>, dunno how to access the associated radar bug entry). - there is no interoperable way to have non-ASCII characters in the filename parameter, so sites need to resort to UA sniffing. The question is: are we satisfied with the situation? If we aren't, what can we do to improve the situation? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 20 June 2008 07:48:11 UTC