- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 22:43:04 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5744 --- Comment #17 from Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu> 2008-06-14 22:43:03 --- (In reply to comment #16) > I think it's pretty clear that there is *some* demand. i really think that if you define demand as "people are implementing javascript libraries to emulate this feature", more or less by definition this cannot happen for a scenario like fragment identifiers. and there is "demand" (more loosly defined) for HTML being a better document format. tons of PDF (as terribly bad as it is as a document format) are still being produced because of basic HTML problems, such as not printing very well, or not not being able to point to document parts (which in PDF can be done by pointing to a page; even PDF had fragment identifiers for this). CSS is (very very slowly) going in that direction with the advanced layout and paged media modules. better fragment identification would be another piece in that puzzle. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 14 June 2008 22:43:38 UTC