- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 19:11:41 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5756 Rob Burns <rob@robburns.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|NEEDSINFO | --- Comment #2 from Rob Burns <rob@robburns.com> 2008-06-14 19:11:41 --- The problem is that certain pieces of document data do not necessarily receive rendering according to the author or user stylesheet. Nevertheless interactive UAs should still make this data available to users through other means even when the styling doesn't expose it directly. Examples include: * title attribute (especially if CSS later provides mechanism for authors to control hover views) * class attribute * lang (or xml:lang) attribute (may provide a localized string for the language instead of the attribute value) * alt attribute (inspector or embedded in the case of a failed resource or by indication of user defaults or with a contextual menu to display alternate in place) element’s keybinding key combination and keybinding event * URIs - cite attribute - src attribute (inspector) - longdesc / described-by attributes * Resources - resource referenced by the cite attribute - resource referenced by the longdesc / described-by attributes (alternately with a contextual menu to display long description fragment in place) * Document relational data - associated definitions and abbreviation expansions - associated citations, quotations, attributions, and bibliographic references - associated subtext or asides * Head metadata such as - name / content pairs for meta elements (inspector) - rel / href pairs for link elements (inspector) * Document list data - table of contents * Tables - Summary for tables - Abbreviations for header cells - Axis membership for table cells The wiki has additional details. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 14 June 2008 19:12:20 UTC