Re: HTML plan review at upcoming AB

 From the 'plan':

The astute reader may note at this point that this organisation takes steps
> towards establishing the WHATWG as one CG (which it already is) that
> publishes through its coordination with the HTML WG, with modifications
> made to account for the atypical nature of the document. There are several
> ways in which such a setup would be desirable, and the organisation is
> deliberate. However it should be noted that it is not at this point a
> political reality, that making it so would require a number of issues
> between the two groups to be addressed, and that *no claim is made here
> about endorsement from the WHATWG for this plan. *


What is happening in regards to talking with whatwg about the plan?

about bug handling, how is a bug submitted on a part of the spec that is
modularised or differs between the w3/whatwg going to be handled?




--

Regards

SteveF
HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/>

On 5 February 2015 at 20:58, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:

> From the plan review itself:
>
>  This is work in progress. It has only been looked at by Sam, Paul,
>> PLH, and Robin. This document has no official status and was simply
>> produced in response to a request from the AB. Some elements of this
>> plan have been rejected previously and could undergo substantial
>> changes before coming into effect.
>>
>
> Full plan can be found here:
>
>   http://darobin.github.io/after5/html-plan.html
>
>  - - -
>
> From the accompanying slides:
>
>   *  Is delegating triage of HTML bugs to the WHATWG acceptable?
>>  *  Is our proposed handling of errata acceptable?
>>  *  Does the AB have an opinion on our “supergroup” organisation?
>>  *  Is our licensing strategy good?
>>  *  Is our plan likely to lead to better browser vendor engagement?
>>  *  Given a CG-based model, what is the incentive for Members to
>> participate?
>>
>
> The full set of slides can be found here:
>
>   http://darobin.github.io/after5/slides/#/
>
>  - - -
>
> Feedback is welcome.  Feedback in the form of pull requests is preferred:
>
>   https://github.com/darobin/after5.git
>
> - Sam Ruby
>
>