- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 12:19:15 +0200
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>
On 2014-09-08 12:03, Robin Berjon wrote: > Hi Julian, > > On 08/09/2014 11:20 , Julian Reschke wrote: >> It is a problem (IMHO) because it's a "MUST" implement lacking an actual >> spec. >> >> Maybe this needs to be demoted to a "MAY" then? > > I hear your discomfort, but I think the above would (meaning no > disrespect) give lawyering precedence over pragmatism. Sniffing is not > optional; it is, however, defined orthogonally. How can it be non-optional if you don't have a spec defining it? > How about this: I add a warning to the reference that conveys your > concerns? Yes, please make a proposal! Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 8 September 2014 10:20:00 UTC