- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 12:03:10 +0200
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>
Hi Julian, On 08/09/2014 11:20 , Julian Reschke wrote: > It is a problem (IMHO) because it's a "MUST" implement lacking an actual > spec. > > Maybe this needs to be demoted to a "MAY" then? I hear your discomfort, but I think the above would (meaning no disrespect) give lawyering precedence over pragmatism. Sniffing is not optional; it is, however, defined orthogonally. How about this: I add a warning to the reference that conveys your concerns? -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Monday, 8 September 2014 10:14:24 UTC