- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 08:05:06 -0400
- To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- CC: "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>
On 5/1/14 11:39 AM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: > On Tue, 2014-04-29 at 12:18 -0400, Arthur Barstow wrote: >> Hi Sam, >> >> I noticed the pub date of the Draft CR is May 6 and it says a Proposed >> Rec won't be published before June 6. Would you please clarify the >> expectations and plans for the CR (f.ex. the status of the test suite, >> is there an agreed set of tests for CR, status of implementations)? > The status of the test suite and implementations was discussed at the > f2f meeting: > http://www.w3.org/2014/04/08-html-wg-minutes.html#item03 OK thanks, but rather than have test suite status in some obscure minutes document, perhaps it would be more generally helpful to include some status info in the test suite rep (f.ex. <https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/tree/master/dom/README.md>). > See also > http://w3c.github.io/dom/test-results/less-than-2.html That's real helpful and perhaps a link to it should be included in the CR's SotD section. > CR publication would be indeed June 6, with a 4 weeks review period. So, I think you mean the plan is to publish the CR on May 6. I still don't quite understand the implications of the Draft CR saying the spec will not be published as a PR before June 6. Is the expectation you will have 2 implementations passing all of the tests by June 6? (I'm trying to get a sense i.e. "guestimate" on when you expect this spec to exit CR.) >> I >> didn't notice any so called `exit criteria` in the Draft but perhaps >> that's included/rationalized in `plan 2014` so I apologize if all of >> this is known. > That was indeed missing in the draft. The plan is to use regular > criteria, ie 2 implementations for every feature. OK, please do include that info in the CR. -Thanks, AB
Received on Friday, 2 May 2014 12:05:34 UTC