+1 I don't have any issue with the text as written, although I am sure it could be improved, but such improvement would be imperceptible to the vast majority of readers and therefore not worth wasting cycles on. -- Regards SteveF HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/> On 27 March 2014 15:31, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> wrote: > On 27/03/2014 15:27 , Glenn Adams wrote: > >> Is there a need to say anything about the WHATWG in the SotD section? I >> would prefer nothing be said there. >> > > The WHATWG is the reason we have this document today and continues to be > the major driving force behind it. Not at the very least mentioning it > would be, in my opinion, very much disingenuous. > > In the interest of actually shipping, can we please stay away from > preferences and stick to things that cause actual problems? I, and I > believe the other editors, would be very thankful. > > > -- > Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon > >
Received on Thursday, 27 March 2014 15:38:03 UTC