W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-admin@w3.org > March 2014

Re: ISSUE-151: whatwg-references - Decision

From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 15:36:55 +0000
Message-ID: <CA+ri+VnSzP8YUM-PF-qGTjC9p+xYXhB=yjpK8po6WqHvmsOAeg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
Cc: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>
+1 I don't have any issue with the text as written, although I am sure it
could be improved, but such improvement would be imperceptible to the vast
majority of readers and therefore not worth wasting cycles on.

--

Regards

SteveF
HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/>


On 27 March 2014 15:31, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> wrote:

> On 27/03/2014 15:27 , Glenn Adams wrote:
>
>> Is there a need to say anything about the WHATWG in the SotD section? I
>> would prefer nothing be said there.
>>
>
> The WHATWG is the reason we have this document today and continues to be
> the major driving force behind it. Not at the very least mentioning it
> would be, in my opinion, very much disingenuous.
>
> In the interest of actually shipping, can we please stay away from
> preferences and stick to things that cause actual problems? I, and I
> believe the other editors, would be very thankful.
>
>
> --
> Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
>
>
Received on Thursday, 27 March 2014 15:38:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:57:26 UTC