W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-admin@w3.org > March 2014

Re: ISSUE-151: whatwg-references - Decision

From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 16:31:21 +0100
Message-ID: <53344449.1070301@w3.org>
To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
CC: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>
On 27/03/2014 15:27 , Glenn Adams wrote:
> Is there a need to say anything about the WHATWG in the SotD section? I
> would prefer nothing be said there.

The WHATWG is the reason we have this document today and continues to be 
the major driving force behind it. Not at the very least mentioning it 
would be, in my opinion, very much disingenuous.

In the interest of actually shipping, can we please stay away from 
preferences and stick to things that cause actual problems? I, and I 
believe the other editors, would be very thankful.

Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Thursday, 27 March 2014 15:31:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:57:26 UTC