W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-admin@w3.org > March 2014

Re: ISSUE-151: whatwg-references - Decision

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 15:12:18 -0400
Message-ID: <53332692.7040906@intertwingly.net>
To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
CC: "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>
On 03/26/2014 02:14 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net
> OK, I have reviewed the status section. It would be useful to improve
> the following wording:
>   * "Work on this specification is also done at the WHATWG
>     <http://www.whatwg.org/>."
>       o I find this confusing since what is being worked on in the
>         WHATWG is more of the nature of an input document to consider
>         for acceptance, mutatis mutandis, in this specification. I'm
>         afraid that as stated, this sentence produces more confusion
>         that it eliminates.
>   * "within the bounds of the W3C HTML working group charter
>     <http://www.w3.org/2013/09/html-charter.html>"
>       o It would be useful to add text to the end of this of the nature
>         "and W3C Process and Patent Policy" (with appropriate links);
> Should anybody have input they would like to provide at a later date
> on this matter, the chairs would encourage that input to be provided
> in the form of bug reports, and for those with input to work with
> the editors to resolve the concerns.

As promised :-), I will now encourage you to open one or more bug 
reports and to work with the editors on this matter.

- Sam Ruby
Received on Wednesday, 26 March 2014 19:12:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:57:26 UTC