RE: CfC: Request transition of HTML5 to Candidate Recommendation

We did the "final" Last Call as planned.  We just exited from that Last Call yesterday.

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329


-----Original Message-----
From: Roy T. Fielding [mailto:fielding@gbiv.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 1:21 PM
To: Sam Ruby
Cc: public-html-admin@w3.org
Subject: Re: CfC: Request transition of HTML5 to Candidate Recommendation

I thought the WG had just made a decision to return the document to an additional last call.  Was that LC made?  Note that the changes haven't even been made it as a WD yet, let alone an LC, so I don't see how that is possible.

....Roy

On Jul 16, 2014, at 8:36 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:

> In accordance with both the W3C process's requirement to record the 
> group's decision to request advancement [1], and with the steps 
> identified in the "Plan 2014" CfC [2], this is a Call for Consensus
> (CfC) to request transition to CR for the following document:
> 
> http://htmlwg.org/heartbeat/CR-html5-20140731/
> 
> For reference, here is a list of bugs addressed during the previous LC for this document:
> 
> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?component=HTML5%20spec&list
> _id=40771&product=HTML%20WG&query_format=advanced&target_milestone=LC
> 
> Silence will be taken to mean there is no objection, but positive 
> responses are encouraged. If there are no objections by Wednesday July 
> 23rd, this resolution will carry.
> 
> Considerations to note:
> 
> - A request to advance indicates that the Working Group believes the 
> specification is stable and appropriate for implementation.
> 
> - The specification MAY still change based on implementation experience.
> 
> - Sam Ruby, on behalf of the W3C co-chairs
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#transition-reqs
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Oct/0026.html
>

Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2014 17:35:59 UTC