- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 10:21:13 -0700
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>
I thought the WG had just made a decision to return the document to an additional last call. Was that LC made? Note that the changes haven't even been made it as a WD yet, let alone an LC, so I don't see how that is possible. ....Roy On Jul 16, 2014, at 8:36 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > In accordance with both the W3C process's requirement to record the > group's decision to request advancement [1], and with the steps > identified in the "Plan 2014" CfC [2], this is a Call for Consensus > (CfC) to request transition to CR for the following document: > > http://htmlwg.org/heartbeat/CR-html5-20140731/ > > For reference, here is a list of bugs addressed during the previous LC for this document: > > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?component=HTML5%20spec&list_id=40771&product=HTML%20WG&query_format=advanced&target_milestone=LC > > Silence will be taken to mean there is no objection, but positive > responses are encouraged. If there are no objections by Wednesday July > 23rd, this resolution will carry. > > Considerations to note: > > - A request to advance indicates that the Working Group believes the > specification is stable and appropriate for implementation. > > - The specification MAY still change based on implementation experience. > > - Sam Ruby, on behalf of the W3C co-chairs > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#transition-reqs > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Oct/0026.html >
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2014 17:21:36 UTC