- From: John C. Vernaleo <john@netpurgatory.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 09:13:06 -0400 (EDT)
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- cc: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>
As before, I agree with Tab on this and object to the EME proposal (heartbeat WD, or otherwise). ------------------------------------------------------- John C. Vernaleo, Ph.D. www.netpurgatory.com john@netpurgatory.com ------------------------------------------------------- On Tue, 24 Sep 2013, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > Same objection I've given every time. Despite the W3C leadership > signing off on this, it's still grossly inappropriate for us to be > doing this, as it goes directly against the basic principles of the > Open Web we claim to stand for. All the relevant arguments have > already been made, so I won't re-make them - they simply keep getting > ignored, rather than addressed, so they're just as valid now as they > were when they were first made. > > (If anyone feels the urge to claim that this is totally in line with > the Open Web and really *I'm* the one being against the Open Web > because I'm restricting consumer's right to choose to consume broken > media, go for it. I won't be responding, because it's stupid.) > > ~TJ > >
Received on Wednesday, 25 September 2013 13:13:33 UTC