Same objection I've given every time. Despite the W3C leadership signing off on this, it's still grossly inappropriate for us to be doing this, as it goes directly against the basic principles of the Open Web we claim to stand for. All the relevant arguments have already been made, so I won't re-make them - they simply keep getting ignored, rather than addressed, so they're just as valid now as they were when they were first made. (If anyone feels the urge to claim that this is totally in line with the Open Web and really *I'm* the one being against the Open Web because I'm restricting consumer's right to choose to consume broken media, go for it. I won't be responding, because it's stupid.) ~TJReceived on Wednesday, 25 September 2013 04:51:40 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:57:24 UTC