Re: Opportunity to revise rationales (was: Polyglot status / roadmap)

I would like to update the rationale a little. However, this week I 
have been completely out of time. Can I get an extension to next week?

Leif H Silli

Sam Ruby, Wed, 13 Nov 2013 12:06:47 -0500:
> On 10/29/2013 02:14 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> The editors of this document are trying to get this document ready for
>> last call.  At the present time, there are two bugs outstanding:
>> 
>> 
https://www.w3.org/bugzilla_public/buglist.cgi?bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=REOPENED&component=HTML%2FXHTML%20Compatibility%20Authoring%20Guide%20%28ed%3A%20Eliot%20Graff%29&product=HTML%20WG&list_id=29356
>> 
>> These two bugs are blocked by HTML specification bugs:
>> 
>> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23368
>> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23587
>> 
>> These bugs, in turn, are assigned to Robin.
> 
> These bugs are now resolved.
> 
>> The chairs intend to do the should do the Polyglot Note vs
>> Recommendation Track Preference Survey once the document is ready for
>> last call, but before it actually goes to last call.  The current draft
>> of the survey can be found here:
>> 
>> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/polyglot-status-preference-poll/
>> 
>> Before the survey is issued, we intend to give everybody an opportunity
>> to update the rationale statements that they provided, should they wish
>> to do so.
> 
> At this time, the chairs would like to give members of the working 
> group an opportunity to update the rationale statements previously 
> provided. At the current time, we have two:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/PolyglotRecommendationRationale
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Nov/0006.html
> 
> Please respond by 20 November, 2013, either with an updated 
> rationale, an indication that no updates are needed, or with a 
> request for more time.
> 
> - Sam Ruby
> 

Received on Thursday, 21 November 2013 16:31:32 UTC