- From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 13:59:10 +0000
- To: Gaël Pegliasco <gael@pegliasco.com>, Ronane <skalala@gmail.com>
- CC: Florian Bösch <pyalot@gmail.com>, Andreas Kuckartz <A.Kuckartz@ping.de>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "timbl@w3.org" <timbl@w3.org>, "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>, "<public-html-media@w3.org>" <public-html-media@w3.org>
> I've just been removed from this list. I will take this problem offline to discuss with Gael and the W3C Team. /paulc Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329 -----Original Message----- From: Gaël Pegliasco [mailto:gael@pegliasco.com] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 9:54 AM To: Ronane Cc: Florian Bösch; Andreas Kuckartz; Sam Ruby; timbl@w3.org; public-html-admin@w3.org; <public-html-media@w3.org> Subject: Re: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD) I've just been removed from this list. I hope this is "accidental" as it would not be very fair-play to automatically unsubscribe people writing objections to EME... Best regards, GaËl, Le 30/05/2013 15:40, Gaël Pegliasco a écrit : > Le 30/05/2013 11:12, Ronane a écrit : >> I agree as well. >> I think that w3c has for now legitimation to develop the standards of >> web but it would lose it if it try to add EME into the web. >> >> > I agree with that point. > This legitimation is acquired because we all agree with W3C Open > Standard and accept to follow these rules defined in the most open way. > > But like any other open source project, W3C can be forked if it choose > to go on closed way. > > Regards, > > Gaël, >
Received on Thursday, 30 May 2013 14:01:06 UTC