RE: CfC: to publish "The picture element" specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)

> Not sure if we should start a separate CfC for that?

I will discus this with my co-chairs to determine what action to take here.

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329


-----Original Message-----
From: Marcos Caceres [mailto:w3c@marcosc.com] 
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 5:28 PM
To: Paul Cotton
Cc: public-html-admin@w3.org; Mathew Marquis; Adrian Bateman
Subject: Re: CfC: to publish "The picture element" specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)

Hi Paul,



On Thursday, 31 January 2013 at 21:44, Paul Cotton wrote:

> This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD) the following “The picture element” document:
>  
> http://picture.responsiveimages.org/

>  
> Silence will be taken to mean there is no objection, but positive responses are encouraged. If there are no objections by Friday Feb 8, this resolution will carry.
>  
> Considerations to note:
>  
> - As a First Public Working Draft, this publication will trigger patent policy review.
>  
> - As a Working Draft publication, the document does not need not be complete, to meet all technical requirements, or to have consensus on the contents.
>  
>  

Seems something got lost in communication. We are actually asking to publish two documents. The second one is:

http://usecases.responsiveimages.org/


It's just intended to be a note, but outlines the use cases that will hopefully underpin both srcset and <picture>. Not sure if we should start a separate CfC for that?

Thanks!

--  
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au

Received on Thursday, 31 January 2013 22:34:37 UTC