Re: Proposed Disposition of Tracker Items

Hi Sam,
have assigned bugs to me, re-opened them and offered an initial resolution
path.

regards
Steve

On 9 January 2013 16:23, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:

> On 01/09/2013 11:12 AM, Steve Faulkner wrote:
>
>> Hi Sam,
>>
>> what do you want me to do with these?
>>
>
> Can you respond to these two comments?
>
> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/**Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9215#**c16<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9215#c16>
> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/**Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9216#c5<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9216#c5>
>
>
>  the alt techniques doc covers both of these:
>>
>> for https://www.w3.org/Bugs/**Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9216<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9216> there is
>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/alt-**techniques/#sec13<http://dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/#sec13>
>>
>> for https://www.w3.org/Bugs/**Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9215<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9215>there is
>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/alt-**techniques/#sec10<http://dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/#sec10>
>>
>> I am assuming you mean that we resolve them by proposing to add these to
>> HTML5?
>>
>
> My understanding of these two bugs is that the differences between the
> HTML 5 spec and that Alt Techniques document need to be worked out, and
> that the action item is on you to provide more information.
>
> Please feel free to correct my understanding.
>
> I'd like these bugs to reflect the current state.  I'm skeptical that
> 'TrackerRequest' is that state.
>
>  regards
>> Steve
>>
>
> - Sam Ruby
>
>  On 9 January 2013 16:00, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net
>> <mailto:rubys@intertwingly.net**>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>     http://w3.org/Bugs/Public/__**buglist.cgi?product=HTML+WG&__**
>> keywords=TrackerRequest<http://w3.org/Bugs/Public/__buglist.cgi?product=HTML+WG&__keywords=TrackerRequest>
>>
>>     <http://w3.org/Bugs/Public/**buglist.cgi?product=HTML+WG&**
>> keywords=TrackerRequest<http://w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?product=HTML+WG&keywords=TrackerRequest>
>> >
>>
>>     Looking at these bugs, I divided them into three buckets:
>>
>>        1) Alt techniques bugs that should be assigned to Steve and
>> resolved
>>           as a part of that dialog.
>>     https://www.w3.org/Bugs/__**Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9215<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/__Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9215>
>>     <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/**Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9215<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9215>
>> >
>>     https://www.w3.org/Bugs/__**Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9216<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/__Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9216>
>>
>>     <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/**Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9216<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9216>
>> >
>>
>>        2) Normative status bugs that should be resolved by preference
>> polls:
>>     https://www.w3.org/Bugs/__**Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12725<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/__Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12725>
>>     <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/**Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12725<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12725>
>> >
>>     https://www.w3.org/Bugs/__**Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12726<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/__Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12726>
>>     <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/**Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12726<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12726>
>> >
>>     https://www.w3.org/Bugs/__**Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20082<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/__Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20082>
>>
>>     <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/**Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20082<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20082>
>> >
>>
>>        3) Bugs resolved by Ian but should be reopened (for 5.1) in order
>> to
>>           get our new editor team to take a position on the matter:
>>     https://www.w3.org/Bugs/__**Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13409<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/__Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13409>
>>     <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/**Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13409<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13409>
>> >
>>     https://www.w3.org/Bugs/__**Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15213<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/__Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15213>
>>     <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/**Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15213<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15213>
>> >
>>     https://www.w3.org/Bugs/__**Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18384<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/__Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18384>
>>
>>     <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/**Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18384<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18384>
>> >
>>
>>     Note: for the bugs in the third bucket, it should still be possible
>> for
>>     the function to be included in HTML 5.0, should an extension spec be
>>     written and progress by made towards satisfying the exit criteria:
>>
>>     http://dev.w3.org/html5/__**decision-policy/decision-__**
>> policy-v3.html#cr-integration<http://dev.w3.org/html5/__decision-policy/decision-__policy-v3.html#cr-integration>
>>
>>     <http://dev.w3.org/html5/**decision-policy/decision-**
>> policy-v3.html#cr-integration<http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy-v3.html#cr-integration>
>> >
>>
>>     - Sam Ruby
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
<http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html>