On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Fred Andrews <fredandw@live.com> wrote: > The issue at hand has wider implications than most. The discussion > started here, continues here, and is planned to return here. I would > ask the Chairs to be tolerant in this special case. > > The W3C are responsible for their own actions. I really don't care > what they decide because if they support DRM then they no longer > matter as the good work will move elsewhere. > You ask the chairs to be tolerant, but then condescend by claiming that if the W3C "support[s] DRM", then the W3C "no longer matter[s]". It is statements like this that show how out of touch some individuals are with respect to both W3C process and industry needs [1]. How can you expect a rational discussion in this context? [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2013Feb/0153.html We are extending them the courtesy of helping them understand the issues. > So, your contribution to this thread is merely to help educate the W3C? Rather patronizing aren't you.
Received on Monday, 11 February 2013 23:24:17 UTC