- From: Fred Andrews <fredandw@live.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 13:53:48 +0000
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 11 February 2013 13:54:15 UTC
Yes, but there appear to be plans for another CfC soon and this is the single most important decision in the history of the web so I for one welcome discussion to continue. The issue of DRM goes way beyond just 'media' - a CDM could well implement an entire HTML rendering engine. I do not support your attempts to quash discussion and or to sideline it into another mailing list. Btw: what is Apple's official position regarding this CfC? I feel silly asking, but do not recall anyone from Apple stating that Apple supports the CfC. cheers Fred > Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 07:40:32 -0500 > From: rubys@intertwingly.net > To: public-html-admin@w3.org > Subject: EME FPWD CfC is closed > > On 02/11/2013 01:16 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > > > It's fine to continue discussion of the bug proposal in email, though it > > should probably be on a technical list rather than on public-html-admin. > > I would recommend a new thread on public-html-media for email > > discussion. I think it's usually a good idea to provide more info > > pre-emptively (either in a bug or in email) but it's also ok to wait to > > see what questions are actually asked. > > Reposting Maciej's comment with a new subject line for visibility. > > > Regards, > > Maciej > > - Sam Ruby > >
Received on Monday, 11 February 2013 13:54:15 UTC