W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-admin@w3.org > February 2013

Re: CfC: to publish "The picture element" specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 09:07:35 -0800
Cc: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>
Message-id: <E9ADE264-A5D8-4508-B044-8AB5FD0C4E5F@apple.com>
To: Mat Marquis <mat@matmarquis.com>

On Jan 31, 2013, at 2:04 PM, Mat Marquis <mat@matmarquis.com> wrote:

> On Jan 31, at 4:44 PM, Paul Cotton wrote:
>> This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD) the following “The picture element” document:
>> http://picture.responsiveimages.org/
> It should be noted here that the `picture` and `srcset` extension specifications are not mutually exclusive [1], and may work together to address the complete set of Use Cases and Requirements for Responsive Images [2].
> There has been a great deal of technical discussion around this extension specification, which can be found in the extension spec’s issue tracker [3] as well as the Use Cases and Requirements document issue tracker [4].

I want to file some bugs against this spec but I'm unsure of the correct component. What's the correct bugzilla component for HTML WG bugs about this draft? Is it HTML WG/Adaptive Images?

I'd like to request that before publication as an FPWD, the draft should be updated to point to public-html and to the appropriate bug component.


Received on Monday, 4 February 2013 17:08:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:57:22 UTC