- From: <janina@rednote.net>
- Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 00:00:02 -0400
- To: HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
- Cc: public-html-admin@w3.org, W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <public-pfwg@w3.org>
Colleagues:
We have received no objections and several messages in support of the
CfC attached below. Therefore, this CfC is confirmed as a consensus
decision of the HTML-A11Y Task Force.
Janina Sajka, For the Task Force Co-Facilitators
Janina Sajka writes:
> Colleagues:
>
> This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to the HTML-A11Y Task Force to
> approve publication of an updated heartbeat draft of "HTML5: Techniques
> for providing useful text alternatives," according to the draft
> available at:
>
> Tiny URL:
> http://tinyurl.com/kjvjqat
>
> Direct URL:
> http://rawgit.com/w3c/alt-techniques/54c868254d49bac4ca1efa7d9907cc85bfa0a3cd/index.html
>
> As discussed in the regular weekly HTML-A11Y Task Force teleconference
> of Thursday 16 October logged at:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2014/10/16-html-a11y-minutes.html#item04
>
> Two editorial corrections are anticipated by this Call for Consensus:
>
> 1.) An appropriate hyperlink in W3C web space will replace the place
> holder hyperlink, currently displaying as "XXXX," should this CfC pass
> and this heartbeat be published by W3C;
>
> 2.) The hyperlink referencing the HTML 5 specification will have its
> display text corrected to indicate the hyperlink points to the Proposed
> Recommendation version of the HTML 5 specification, and not the W3C Last
> Call version, as currently displayed.
>
> In the interest of achieving publication of this heartbeat Working Draft
> ahead of the publication moratorium surrounding TPAC, a concurrent CfC
> is ongoing in the PFWG. HTML-WG process does not require a CfC for
> heartbeat publications.
>
> ACTION TO TAKE
>
> According to agreed HTML-A11Y Task Force Consensus Procedures [1], this
> CfC is now open for objection, comment, as well as statements of support
> via email. Silence will be interpreted as support, though messages of
> support are certainly welcome.
>
> If you object to this proposed action, or have comments concerning this
> proposal, please respond by replying on list to this message no later
> than 23:59 (Midnight) Boston Time on Wednesday 22 October.
>
> Janina Sajka, For the Task Force Co-Facilitators
>
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/consensus-procedures
>
>
> --
>
> Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200
> sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net
> Email: janina@rednote.net
>
> Linux Foundation Fellow
> Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org
>
> The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
> Chair, Protocols & Formats http://www.w3.org/wai/pf
> Indie UI http://www.w3.org/WAI/IndieUI/
>
> --
>
> Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200
> sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net
> Email: janina@rednote.net
>
> Linux Foundation Fellow
> Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org
>
> The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
> Chair, Protocols & Formats http://www.w3.org/wai/pf
> Indie UI http://www.w3.org/WAI/IndieUI/
>
> Colleagues:
>
> This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to confirm the sufficiency and
> accuracy of guidance on the alternative text attribute for images as
> provided by the following two related HTML-WG documents. It is also a
> Call for Consensus regarding proposed next steps for each of these
> documents.
>
> You will recall the relationship between these documents is that the
> first was initially created to elaborate criticisms against the
> sufficiency of alt guidance in the second. In other words, initially
> guidance in these two documents was different, and the two did not agree
> one with the other.
>
> We believe that over the past few years these differences have been
> successfully resolved. This CfC tests this assertion. For the record we
> are requesting the HTML-A11Y Task Force confirm this understanding,
> or point out specific remaining insufficiencies.
>
> 1.) HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives
> http://rawgit.com/w3c/alt-techniques/master/index.html
>
> This document was initially created to help remedy insufficiencies in
> early drafts of the HTML 5.0 specification. Over the past few years,
> guidance originally present in this document has been migrated to the
> HTML specification itself and removed from this document. However, it is
> believed that the remaining content in this document still provides
> valuable guidance to HTML authors.
>
> Recent edits to this document can be seen in the W3C Bugzilla bugs shown
> at the following URI:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/kjvj3bb
>
> A permanent, though very long URI for these bugs is:
>
> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=CLOSED&component=CR%20alt%20techniques%20%28editor%3A%20Steven%20Faulkner%29&list_id=37965&product=HTML%20WG&query_format=advanced
>
> QUESTION 1: Does the Task Force
> a.) Accept these identified changes to this document
> b.) Recommend that work on this document be terminated; and
> c.) Support publication of this document by the HTML-WG
> as a W3C Note.
>
> 2.) HTML 5.0 Sec. 4.7.1.1 Requirements for providing text to act as
> an alternative for images
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/embedded-content.html#alt
>
> As noted above there have been significant edits to this section of the
> HTML 5.0 specification in order that this specification might best
> reflect current consensus guidance regarding alt. These changes are
> documented by the following W3C Bugzilla bugs:
>
> {Insert Bug List Here}
>
> QUESTION 2: Does the Task Force:
> a.) Accept these identified changes to this specification;
> b.) Recommend that work on this specification be terminated; and
> c.) Support publication of this section of this
> specification by the HTML-WG as part of W3C HTML 5.0.
>
> ACTION TO TAKE
>
> According to agreed HTML-A11Y Task Force Consensus Procedures [1], this
> CfC is now open for objection, comment, as well as statements of support
> via email. Silence will be interpreted as support, though messages of
> support are certainly welcome.
>
> If you have objections to any part of the above two questions, or any
> comments concerning the proposed next steps for either of the above
> documents, please respond by replying on list to this message no later
> than midnight Boston Time, Wednesday 4 June.
>
> Janina on behalf of the Task Force Facilitators
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/consensus-procedures
>
> --
>
> Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200
> sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net
> Email: janina@rednote.net
>
> Linux Foundation Fellow
> Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org
>
> The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
> Chair, Protocols & Formats http://www.w3.org/wai/pf
> Indie UI http://www.w3.org/WAI/IndieUI/
>
--
Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200
sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net
Email: janina@rednote.net
Linux Foundation Fellow
Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org
The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
Chair, Protocols & Formats http://www.w3.org/wai/pf
Indie UI http://www.w3.org/WAI/IndieUI/
Received on Thursday, 23 October 2014 04:00:31 UTC