- From: <janina@rednote.net>
- Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 00:00:02 -0400
- To: HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
- Cc: public-html-admin@w3.org, W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <public-pfwg@w3.org>
Colleagues: We have received no objections and several messages in support of the CfC attached below. Therefore, this CfC is confirmed as a consensus decision of the HTML-A11Y Task Force. Janina Sajka, For the Task Force Co-Facilitators Janina Sajka writes: > Colleagues: > > This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to the HTML-A11Y Task Force to > approve publication of an updated heartbeat draft of "HTML5: Techniques > for providing useful text alternatives," according to the draft > available at: > > Tiny URL: > http://tinyurl.com/kjvjqat > > Direct URL: > http://rawgit.com/w3c/alt-techniques/54c868254d49bac4ca1efa7d9907cc85bfa0a3cd/index.html > > As discussed in the regular weekly HTML-A11Y Task Force teleconference > of Thursday 16 October logged at: > > http://www.w3.org/2014/10/16-html-a11y-minutes.html#item04 > > Two editorial corrections are anticipated by this Call for Consensus: > > 1.) An appropriate hyperlink in W3C web space will replace the place > holder hyperlink, currently displaying as "XXXX," should this CfC pass > and this heartbeat be published by W3C; > > 2.) The hyperlink referencing the HTML 5 specification will have its > display text corrected to indicate the hyperlink points to the Proposed > Recommendation version of the HTML 5 specification, and not the W3C Last > Call version, as currently displayed. > > In the interest of achieving publication of this heartbeat Working Draft > ahead of the publication moratorium surrounding TPAC, a concurrent CfC > is ongoing in the PFWG. HTML-WG process does not require a CfC for > heartbeat publications. > > ACTION TO TAKE > > According to agreed HTML-A11Y Task Force Consensus Procedures [1], this > CfC is now open for objection, comment, as well as statements of support > via email. Silence will be interpreted as support, though messages of > support are certainly welcome. > > If you object to this proposed action, or have comments concerning this > proposal, please respond by replying on list to this message no later > than 23:59 (Midnight) Boston Time on Wednesday 22 October. > > Janina Sajka, For the Task Force Co-Facilitators > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/consensus-procedures > > > -- > > Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200 > sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net > Email: janina@rednote.net > > Linux Foundation Fellow > Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org > > The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) > Chair, Protocols & Formats http://www.w3.org/wai/pf > Indie UI http://www.w3.org/WAI/IndieUI/ > > -- > > Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200 > sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net > Email: janina@rednote.net > > Linux Foundation Fellow > Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org > > The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) > Chair, Protocols & Formats http://www.w3.org/wai/pf > Indie UI http://www.w3.org/WAI/IndieUI/ > > Colleagues: > > This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to confirm the sufficiency and > accuracy of guidance on the alternative text attribute for images as > provided by the following two related HTML-WG documents. It is also a > Call for Consensus regarding proposed next steps for each of these > documents. > > You will recall the relationship between these documents is that the > first was initially created to elaborate criticisms against the > sufficiency of alt guidance in the second. In other words, initially > guidance in these two documents was different, and the two did not agree > one with the other. > > We believe that over the past few years these differences have been > successfully resolved. This CfC tests this assertion. For the record we > are requesting the HTML-A11Y Task Force confirm this understanding, > or point out specific remaining insufficiencies. > > 1.) HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives > http://rawgit.com/w3c/alt-techniques/master/index.html > > This document was initially created to help remedy insufficiencies in > early drafts of the HTML 5.0 specification. Over the past few years, > guidance originally present in this document has been migrated to the > HTML specification itself and removed from this document. However, it is > believed that the remaining content in this document still provides > valuable guidance to HTML authors. > > Recent edits to this document can be seen in the W3C Bugzilla bugs shown > at the following URI: > > http://tinyurl.com/kjvj3bb > > A permanent, though very long URI for these bugs is: > > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=CLOSED&component=CR%20alt%20techniques%20%28editor%3A%20Steven%20Faulkner%29&list_id=37965&product=HTML%20WG&query_format=advanced > > QUESTION 1: Does the Task Force > a.) Accept these identified changes to this document > b.) Recommend that work on this document be terminated; and > c.) Support publication of this document by the HTML-WG > as a W3C Note. > > 2.) HTML 5.0 Sec. 4.7.1.1 Requirements for providing text to act as > an alternative for images > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/embedded-content.html#alt > > As noted above there have been significant edits to this section of the > HTML 5.0 specification in order that this specification might best > reflect current consensus guidance regarding alt. These changes are > documented by the following W3C Bugzilla bugs: > > {Insert Bug List Here} > > QUESTION 2: Does the Task Force: > a.) Accept these identified changes to this specification; > b.) Recommend that work on this specification be terminated; and > c.) Support publication of this section of this > specification by the HTML-WG as part of W3C HTML 5.0. > > ACTION TO TAKE > > According to agreed HTML-A11Y Task Force Consensus Procedures [1], this > CfC is now open for objection, comment, as well as statements of support > via email. Silence will be interpreted as support, though messages of > support are certainly welcome. > > If you have objections to any part of the above two questions, or any > comments concerning the proposed next steps for either of the above > documents, please respond by replying on list to this message no later > than midnight Boston Time, Wednesday 4 June. > > Janina on behalf of the Task Force Facilitators > > [1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/consensus-procedures > > -- > > Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200 > sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net > Email: janina@rednote.net > > Linux Foundation Fellow > Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org > > The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) > Chair, Protocols & Formats http://www.w3.org/wai/pf > Indie UI http://www.w3.org/WAI/IndieUI/ > -- Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200 sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net Email: janina@rednote.net Linux Foundation Fellow Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Chair, Protocols & Formats http://www.w3.org/wai/pf Indie UI http://www.w3.org/WAI/IndieUI/
Received on Thursday, 23 October 2014 04:00:31 UTC