On 10 November 2014 19:14, <chaals@yandex-team.ru> wrote: > Actually, I disagree. The HTML spec gets referenced as a "Standard" in a > way that the Note should not (since it doesn't get any measure of the > consensus of the W3C as a whole). > > The two documents should be in synch at the point where an HTML > Recommendation, and perhaps even a Working Draft, is published, but the > reason for a Note is that editors who are used to the publishing process, > in groups who do work, can turn them around much faster. Without being a > formal W3C Recommendation, this can still be useful as an indication of how > the Working Group's thinking is evolving. > > I doubt there is a huge risk of the HTML spec giving contradictory advice > if we get this note more or less up to scratch, and maintain it as > necessary. > +1 As an editor of the HTML spec I am continuing to actively develop the alt advice in HTML 5.1 as previously mentioned. I look forward to working with the alt note editors to ensure that any advice in the techniques note is synchronized with the advice in the HTML specification. -- Regards SteveF HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/>
Received on Monday, 10 November 2014 19:25:42 UTC