Re: Next Tasks on the Text Alternatives Document from Sam Ruby on 2014-11-10 (public-html-a11y@w3.org from November 2014)

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:17:17 -0500
To: public-html-a11y@w3.org
CC: steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <54610F3D.10308@intertwingly.net>

On 11/10/2014 01:45 PM, Shane McCarron wrote:
>  3. Duplicated text shouldn't be in html specification - it will diverge
>     with this note and there is always a risk that there will be
>     conflicting advise.  Moreover, the HTML spec already references this
>     note.

I was afraid this would happen.

As an editor of the Text Alternatives document feel free to decide what 
should be in the Text Alternatives Document.

If you have feedback on what should be in the HTML specification, I 
encourage you to post your suggestions on public-html.

- Sam Ruby

Received on Monday, 10 November 2014 19:17:43 UTC