- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 14:13:26 -0400
- To: <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
- CC: <kirsten@can-adapt.com>
I don't have strong feelings one way or the other, I was given an action item from the Accessibility Task force as we did a walkthrough of the standard yesterday, to test the examples in the Table section. I was quite surprised at the results. Summary has been dropped for X years and those Table examples have been in the HTML 5 Doc for X years... AT has done nothing so far to adapt to our examples, I hope Rich's influence will help. I don't think we should include information that doesn't work in a normative document, unless AT companies have said, yes we will support your examples. I would also suggest removing the error in the validator which currently says: "x The summary attribute is obsolete. Consider describing the structure of the table in a caption element or in a figure element containing the table; or, simplify the structure of the table so that no description is needed." http://tinyurl.com/kyuw3se Cheers David MacDonald CanAdapt Solutions Inc. Adapting the web to all users Including those with disabilities www.Can-Adapt.com -----Original Message----- From: Joshue O Connor [mailto:joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie] Sent: June-21-13 1:09 PM To: public-html-a11y@w3.org Subject: Re: HTML5 alternatives to table summary don't work in current browsers, and Screen Readers Janina Sajka wrote: > The current status of HTML 5 is CR. To change the spec would require a > return to Last Call. I'm not for that over table summary [...] > I'm perfectly OK with #2. I agree it leaves a gap, but we've had a gap > for sometime already. Fortunately, the gap will soon be filled, namely > when we do our FPWD of ARIA 1.1 later this year. I'm for going > forward, not backward. I'm also ok with this. HTH Josh > Just my 2 cents (American). > > Janina > > David MacDonald writes: >> Hi Richard >> >> >> >> A small correction to your take on what I said in my post. I actually >> did not make a recommendation to return to table Summary. I am simply >> documenting that as we enter into recommendation status, the advice >> we are providing to web authors fails WCAGs conformance requirement >> of accessibility support. And the example techniques listed currently >> don't help blind folks... even though web authors trust us to give >> them useful advice. >> >> >> >> There are certainly well documented disadvantages (and advantages) to >> the Summary attribute but until AT catches up on replacements, and >> they have had several years to do so, we are looking at another of >> those awful gaps that work on paper but not in the real world for blind folks. >> >> >> >> Cheers >> >> David MacDonald >> >> >> >> CanAdapt Solutions Inc. >> >> Adapting the web to all users >> >> Including those with disabilities >> >> <http://www.can-adapt.com/> www.Can-Adapt.com >> >> >> >> From: Richard Schwerdtfeger [mailto:schwer@us.ibm.com] >> Sent: June-21-13 10:48 AM >> To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org; public-html-a11y@w3.org >> Cc: Steve Faulkner; mick@nvaccess.org >> Subject: Re: HTML5 alternatives to table summary don't work in >> current browsers, and Screen Readers >> >> >> >> David, >> >> I saw your post that you think summary should be reinstated because >> of a JAWS and/or NVDA have a defect (it works in VoiceOver) does not >> warrant going back to the hodge podge of attributes that were thrown >> in at the end of HTML 4's release. >> >> Let's stick with a consistent set of APIs (ARIA) that developers can >> go to as much as possible for one stop shopping. >> >> I have alerted Freedom Scientific of the defect and they will fix it. >> I have copied Mick Curran at NVDA and hopefully they will also >> correct the problem with IE and Firefox. >> >> Mick, please see the following link: >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2013AprJun/0089.html#s >> tart89 >> >> We can't be writing specs. based on proprietary assistive technology >> defects. >> >> Rich >> >> >> >> Rich Schwerdtfeger >> >
Received on Friday, 21 June 2013 18:14:01 UTC