- From: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
- Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 10:11:00 -0400
- To: HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Minutes from the HTML-A11Y Task Force teleconference of 15 August are provided below s text, and are available as hypertext at:
http://www.w3.org/2013/08/15-html-a11y-minutes.html
W3C
- DRAFT -
HTML Accessibility Task Force
15 Aug 2013
See also: IRC log
Attendees
Present
Mark_Sadecki, [IPcaller], John_Foliot, lwatson, Janina, chaals, David_MacDonald
Regrets
Chair
SV_MEETING_CHAIR
Scribe
janina
Contents
* Topics
1. procedures CfC
2. longdesc: testing, Last Call comments
3. Alt Edits Completed
4. HTML 5 Testing
5. subteams
6. html 5.1
* Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
<chaals> We are waiting on PF for a proposal that would satisfy them. HTML is waiting on a new proposal.
<chaals> What to do with the tests proposed http://github.com/chaals/longdesc-tests
<chaals> Plan for resolving last call issues
<chaals> Plan for tracking LC comments explicitly
<scribe> scribe: janina
procedures CfC
<chaals> CN: PF objected tothe procedures, so the CfCs failed.
Charles: Proposes that telecon may propose a CFC, and the facilitators will start with a email
<JF> thought we were talking about longdesc / thought we were talking about longdesc
Charles: Proposes comments in telecon will count
janina: Suggests lang needs to confirm telecon can make decisions, but subject to email or WBS CFC confirmation
Charles: Suggests telecon comments should count because commenter is responsible for correcting any mistatement by the scribe
<JF> +1 to Chaals re: minutes. Gregory R. used to always note that corrections should be sent to the list
longdesc: testing, Last Call comments
charles: Wrote some tests
jf: Looks good, can help
... Have strong objections re LC comments received in email ...
charles: Can we talk testing first?
jf: OK
Charles: Don't know how to automate tests ...
... Tests I've proposed have no status yet, expect we'll consider for a few days yet then do cfc against them
... Would be helpful for people to run tests know and email initial results
<lwatson> Zakim: https://github.com/chaals/longdesc-tests
Mark: Tests look good ...
... Can get a stble uri for them and add the descriptions
<scribe> ACTION: Mark to add descriptions [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/08/15-html-a11y-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> 'Mark' is an ambiguous username. Please try a different identifier, such as family name or username (e.g., mhakkine, msadecki, mwatson2).
<scribe> ACTION: marks to add Charles descriptions to the proposed longdesc tests [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/08/15-html-a11y-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-190 - Add charles descriptions to the proposed longdesc tests [on Mark Sadecki - due 2013-08-22].
Chalres: Suggest we start collecting results on a wiki page
Charles: Not worried about how people report. It's a small set, and we can normalize results in our report
... Suggest we run CFC on these test longer than usual as it's August vacation for many people
DM: Asks about where the tests are and how to use them
Charles: They're on github
janina: URI above
Charles: Let's move to the comments discussion ...
jf: Have strong concerns about comments received. Words like "better" may not be appropriate in this doc
... e.g. epub authoring guidance should be in epub, not in this TF's spec
janina +`1
charles; Think it may be useful to provide some guidance on when and how to use the spec
charles: So, an ongoing discussion in email on what may be OK
jf: Our spec is about images, why are we discussing svg, or epub?
charles: because are images
... Notes that only some ua's make svg a11y
jf: Suggest it's counter to our purpose to put qualified authoring guidance into this spec, i.e. ua X & Y support, but on others do Z
charles: Suggests JF chime in on email thread
janina: Agree with JF but also concerned that there are still use cases, even when full ml might exist, to provide an overview of the structure e.g. in a textbook
leonie: Suggest we not try accomplish all this in this early doc
charles: Agree with LW. People should be able to generalize from our spec
... Notes that even jpeg supports providing an overview, also svg
... In a transitionary world, which we're in, we do, because not all can take advantage of svg a11y
... I expect to raise a bug on how we handle this
marks: Have we considered using comment tracker?
<MarkS> https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/44061/WD-html-longdesc-20130716/
marks: Have input comments received just to see how the tool works and might help with responses
charles: agree it's a good tool
... So, if there, let's use it?
janina: Agree. We're obligated to show response to all comments with rationale
Alt Edits Completed
HTML 5 Testing
marks: Heard from Jason White that we should look how a11y apis map lang
... Otherwise no issue to test
... Requested extension on our response to Sep 4
... Inasmuch as current Sep 1 is Sunday of a 3-day holliday weekend
... Have test file from Rich for testing focus rings, and have run tests with mixed results
... Definitely useful to forward
subteams
<David_> Longdesc test files uploaded http://davidmacd.com/test/longdesc-tests-master/
marks: No quorum in Bug triage
... Looked at bugs, have one to ask now
<MarkS> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22931
marks: Wondering whether this sufficiently supports magnification, i.e. to find the iframe
dm: Don't think so at this time, what would help?
leonie: Mags will follow mouse for focus, including into an iframe
marks: OK
html 5.1
marks: we need dialog or transcripts ml? Perhaps?
charles: This issue has a history, even back in HTML 4
... agree it would be useful to ml discussions better than we can now
janina: Also suggesting date pickers
charles: Suggest people look at inputs and web components. Important for html
<scribe> ACTION: Charles to provide pointer for web components work to the list [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/08/15-html-a11y-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-191 - Provide pointer for web components work to the list [on Charles McCathie Nevile - due 2013-08-22].
<David_> Focus enhancements http://www.aisquared.com/docs/zt10/zt10_QRG_UK_English.pdf page 25
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: Charles to provide pointer for web components work to the list [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/08/15-html-a11y-minutes.html#action03]
[NEW] ACTION: Mark to add descriptions [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/08/15-html-a11y-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: marks to add Charles descriptions to the proposed longdesc tests [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/08/15-html-a11y-minutes.html#action02]
[End of minutes]
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Found Scribe: janina
Present: Mark_Sadecki [IPcaller] John_Foliot lwatson Janina chaals David_MacDonald
People with action items: charles marks
--
Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200
sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net
Email: janina@rednote.net
Linux Foundation Fellow
Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org
The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
Chair, Protocols & Formats http://www.w3.org/wai/pf
Indie UI http://www.w3.org/WAI/IndieUI/
Received on Friday, 16 August 2013 14:11:29 UTC