- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 15:59:31 +0000
- To: HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+ri+VnyxBuOeKLSrY6rU4CFpCFQehDMEdf8cD4tnrrXPupqJQ@mail.gmail.com>
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> Date: 23 November 2012 15:47 Subject: Usage of Alt To: "HTML WG (public-html@w3.org)" <public-html@w3.org> Hi all, as indicated in the CfC caveat for the publication of the HTML CR, in the discussion of the AltTech specification with its objection, and, you know, ISSUE-31, there is some amount of disagreement about the advice to be given about our poor old alt attribute. In order to get a feel for how it was actually used in the wild, I quickly generated a usage report to see if we could make some useful inferences. I don't claim that it's a solution, or that it is decisive data, but it might help. You can read more at: http://htmlwg.org/alt-usage/. >From looking at the inline variant of the report, my sense is that the HTML specification as currently drafted is not paving the cow paths. Thoughts, suggestions for improvements, welcome. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon -- with regards Steve Faulkner Technical Director - TPG www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com | www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives - dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/ Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
Received on Friday, 23 November 2012 16:00:47 UTC