Re: Call for Consensus (CFC) to move forward the HTML5 Image Description Extension spec for publication (FPWD)

While I support this doc and progressing it, I agree with David and that 
we should remove the example if it is incorrect, or likely to cause more 
dissonance than it is worth.

Also it may be better to have a longdesc example on an informative 
rather than decorative image - as this is a stronger use case IMO. 
Either way, this is a discussion that we can have after the CFC period 
is closed, as it isn't a block.

Cheers

Josh

Received on Thursday, 22 November 2012 08:30:52 UTC