On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>wrote: > Hi Silvia , thanks for the prompt response. > > adding ted into mix. > > On 15 November 2012 00:14, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hi Steve, >> >> I am actually disappointed that there was never a decision made on issue >> 194 in the HTML WG. We still have two competing proposals that are almost >> identical and for which we haven't had feedback from all browsers. I am >> hesitant to write an extension spec without more input from other potential >> implementers on which way forward they prefer on this. >> > > Is there a possibility that we (interested parties) can work together to > merge the 2 proposals? and/or reach out to implementers for feedback? > which implementers do we need to get feedback from? > IIUC Opera, Mozilla, IE haven't said anything about the need for @transcript and which of the two proposals they would prefer. > I am, however, considering to write an extension spec on something >> orthogonal that came up in the process of discussing the @transcript >> attribute: a <transcript> element in which time-aligned interactive >> transcripts could be displayed by the browser. I am keen to see that >> implemented and experimented with for HTML5.1. >> > > Is there anything the taskforce can do to kelp you along with this? > I think we had quite a valuable discussion about the needs already and I have some example sites that use it, so I was going to make a first draft based on those. It's mostly a matter of making the time to do it. Silvia.
Received on Friday, 16 November 2012 01:11:22 UTC