- From: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 19:25:24 -0400
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Cc: HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Quoting Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>: > > At this stage I think the situation is pretty sad, and while I'm > prepared to work on anything that makes sense, I am unhappy enough > to accept a half-arsed hand-me-down as better than nothing. :( But > in principle I still agree with you, because it seems that putting > in accessibility solutions we haven't thought through really > incredibly carefully isn't a good idea (witness the small editorial > mistakes that cost accesskey a decade, or the apparently > spur-of-the-moment "solution" to hit testing on canvas). While this makes a certain sense on paper, I find it equally discouraging to simply shrug and say "let it sail, too bad the life-boats aren't ready". For this reason I would be very distressed to leave any known accessibility issues on the shelf in the interest of making a "shipping date". I note with a certain sense of continued frustration that as recently as last May there was a resigned agreement to proceed to Last Call without resolving Issue 30, with A "PROMISE" to expedite that Issue thereafter. The road to Dante's Inferno is paved with good intentions... JF
Received on Thursday, 29 March 2012 23:25:47 UTC