- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 12:03:33 -0600
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Cc: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>, WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Hi Leif, > Not 'ahead'. Only as a third or fourth CP - alongside the nochange and > Laura's CP etc. [snip] > That an 'obsolete but conforming' CP - or any other CP - materializes, > would not inflict on that. It would only mean that yet another CP would > be heard, together with the current ones. Sam has already stated that the Chairs want TWO proposals not THREE for the Issue 30 survey. He said "Surveys work best when there are exactly two options to chose from." It was their rationale for splitting off Jonas' proposal into a separate issue. Best Regards, Laura -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2012 18:04:02 UTC