- From: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:02:46 -0400
- To: HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Minutes from the teleconference of the HTML-A11Y Task Force on 13 October are provided below in text and are available as hypertext at: http://www.w3.org/2011/10/13-html-a11y-minutes.html W3C - DRAFT - HTML Accessibility Task Force Teleconference 13 Oct 2011 See also: IRC log Attendees Present Mike, Rich_Schwerdtfeger, Rich, paulc, Judy, [IPcaller], Michael_Cooper, Mike.a, Cynthia_Shelly, +1.617.615.aaaa Regrets Chair SV_MEETING_CHAIR Scribe janina Contents * Topics 1. Paul to explain escalation options for two current P1 a11y bugs 2. Subteam Reports: Media; Text; Canvas; ARIA Mappings; Bug Triage 3. review bugzilla a11y-tf "needs info" bugs 4. review other bugzilla a11y-tf bugs 5. Other Business 6. Identify Scribe for 06 October * Summary of Action Items __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ <trackbot> Date: 13 October 2011 <scribe> Meeting: HTML-A11Y telecon <paulc> P1 bugs: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=REOPENED&component=LC1+HTML%2BR DFa+%28editor%3A+Manu+Sporny%29&component=LC1+HTML%2FXHTML+Compat.+Authoring+Guide+%28ed%3A+Eliot+Graff%29&component=LC 1+HTML+Canvas+2D+Context+%28editor%3A+Ian+Hickson%29&component=LC1+HTML+Microdata+%28editor%3A+Ian+Hickson%29&component =LC1+HTML5+spec+%28editor%3A+Ian+Hickson%29&component=LC1+alt+techniques+%28editor%3A+Steven+Fau <paulc> I am testing whether the long URL actually works. <scribe> scribe: janina Paul to explain escalation options for two current P1 a11y bugs paulc: Relates to WG Action-204 <paulc> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/204?changelog paulc: Sam got no response ... Chairs have no consensus on escalation ... However, bug originator has that authority -- to escalate ... So, if disatisfied, originator can escalate to an issue <paulc> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13181 <paulc> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13176 paulc: Want to be clear I'm not telling anyone to do this, just laying out the option judy: A bit confused here ... <paulc> Description P1 bugs and their processing: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Jun/0315.html janina: The problem for us is the desire to try and resolve how to move forward without getting into the world of cp's and counter-cp's, and surveys simply because the editor isn't responding paulc: adding the tracker request means the bugs will likely be issues within a day or so ... at that point the time clock on cp's etc starts ... else, if we leave this to dec 31, which is the editor's deadline, rich: we're also waiting on maciej response on draw focus ring, as he's asked for changes ... Maciej asked we split this out, our question is 'does it look OK' paulc: On that, I have no more I can add rich: feel like we're squeezed in part because we're waiting a month for a response from one of the chairs janina: Think there are two things here getting tangled paulc: One is the process of bug handling then escalating janina: Second is the attemtp to respond to Maciej's suggestion. Have we satisfied his suggestion? We're unclear and have no response on that judy: Wondering if we need to revisit coordination ... Think Paul has been clear with us, but some of this goes beyond ... Suggest we assign this to us, myself, Janina, Paul, etc to take on a coordination level rich: How do I reopen Issue-131 paulc: Is this this topic, or rich: Maciej says 'reopen issue-131' but i don't know how paulc: Looking ... <MikeSmith> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011May/0138.html "Final decision on Issue-131" paulc: Suggest an email publically saying why the request to reopen <paulc> Here is the link to ISSUE-131: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/131 rich: Will Maciej be on the WG call, I want to ask whether he's happy with the changes before I move forward with the request to reopen paulc: Suggest as part of the a11y report Subteam Reports: Media; Text; Canvas; ARIA Mappings; Bug Triage <MikeSmith> janina: Media subteam has not planned to meet for some time janina: Media not currently active, though we need to ping on a couple issues <MikeSmith> ... John and I have discussed a couple things we need to get together to talk about more, but we have not done that yet judy: On text <Judy> http://www.w3.org/2011/10/11-text-minutes.html judy: New time not working, will try Tuesdays at 1PM Boston ... On longdesc, John has responded at length to Jonas ... Janina is completing a brief response on Matt's cp ... Maciej had suggested to fold John's content into Laura's cp paulc: Don't think this is a chairs response, just a suggestion from Maciej judy: On meta generator -- Janina coordinating with Steve Faulkner's proposal, not yet settled ... On Table Summary, progress on expanded uses cases, ... the css generated content questin now morphing into something that PF will discuss with CSS mike: Think Maciej's comment was simply his own suggestion judy: Question we're concerned is whether our response to Jonas will be considered as sufficient group response <Stevef> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/notitlev2 mike: Next Bug Triage leonie: Almost done with priority evaluation, we've changed two, I think ... Next we go through to manage that there is sufficient info, etc review bugzilla a11y-tf "needs info" bugs <MikeSmith> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?product=HTML+WG&keywords=a11ytf&bug_status=RESOLVED&resolution=NEEDSINFO <MikeSmith> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12964 Steve: Seems Silvia asked some open ended questions, therefore the current status michael: Perhaps Silvia neglect to change bug status? mike: Sounds right. I'm moving it to 'reopened' <MikeSmith> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11956 <MikeSmith> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11956#c12 mike: Editor says he doesn't understand the problem, where's the responsibility? ... This has been there awhile steve: Feel like a continuing runaround ... Will look at it but feel it's something that won't be addressed, feels futilie ... Issue seems common sense to me judy: Anything we can do to facilitate this? ... Seems we've a few issues today with "sand in the gears" steve: Editor has formally objected to reversions paulc: Both revert requests were reverted by chairs ... Ian' has formal object to that <MikeSmith> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/spec/Overview.html.diff?r1=1.5345;r2=1.5346;f=h <paulc> Formal objections: http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/formal-objection-status.html judy: So my suggestion is do the next step, with apologies that it's needed to be done steve ok <MikeSmith> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10784 mike: This is issue-32, where we have a decision janina, also not favored in the TF michael: We can't assume Gregory will be back in a time frame we can work with mike: Suggest removing a11ytf keyword janina, agree [no objection on call] review other bugzilla a11y-tf bugs Other Business Identify Scribe for 06 October Steve Faulkner volunteers ah, that should have been 20 October! Summary of Action Items [End of minutes] __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ -- Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200 sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net Chair, Open Accessibility janina@a11y.org Linux Foundation http://a11y.org Chair, Protocols & Formats Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/wai/pf World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
Received on Thursday, 13 October 2011 16:03:13 UTC