- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 15:29:51 +0000
- To: public-html-a11y@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11557 --- Comment #31 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> 2011-11-20 15:29:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #30) > See comment #27 from Steve > > If it is agreed, then a complete list of legitimate exceptions can be provided. > > And see comment #28 from Aryeh: > > So if everyone is okay with this, we just need a list of what roles should be > > allowed despite being redundant. The current sentence that was left in the > > WHATWG spec ("Authors must not set the ARIA role and aria-* attributes to > > values that match the default implicit ARIA semantics defined in the following > > two tables") is too broad. > > Given those comments, it seems this bug is waiting on somebody (Steve?) to > provide a proposed list of roles. I am prepared to do the work to provide a list so conformance can be tightened, but would first like an acknowledgement from the editor that this would be acceptable to him, as I do not want to waste my time. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 20 November 2011 15:29:56 UTC