Re: Consensus on longdesc change proposal

Thanks, Laura, for making some of the changes that I suggested.

Actually, I want to discuss another question - one that will likely be
core to the discussion with Jonas' proposed change proposal.

The longdesc change proposal says in the section on "Suggested
Alternatives Are Not Viable Solutions" about aria-describedby:

"aria-describedby kills off links: ARIA 1.0 specifies that anything
that aria-describedby points to is presented to the user as if it
occurred inside an attribute. Hence, if aria-describedby points to an
element which is - or contains - a link, the link will be completely
dead - the AT won't even inform the user about the link presence. "

I believe from recent discussions that ARIA specifies no such thing,
but just that this is just the way in which screenreaders have
implemented support for aria-describedby. Also, IIUC it is an
intention that screenreaders should be changed, in particular that
they should provide links and change the language model if a @lang
attribute is given in a section linked to by aria-describedby.

It might be good to discuss this.


On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 5:07 AM, Laura Carlson
<> wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
> Thank you for the strong support [1] of the longdesc Change Proposal (CP) [2].
> Judy suggested that I go ahead with suggested changes now.
> So I am pleased to inform you that I have updated the CP, as result of
> comments made by members of this task force and others. I would like
> to extend special thanks to Cynthia, Silvia and Gez. I've tried to
> incorporate feedback as best that I could to with consideration of all
> views. Can everyone not live with the Change Proposal now?
> Best Regards,
> Laura
> [1]
> [2]
> --
> Laura L. Carlson

Received on Thursday, 26 May 2011 00:51:03 UTC