- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 13:10:22 +0200
- To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Cc: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Laura Carlson, Mon, 9 May 2011 19:03:39 -0500: > Do you think we should keep the images in the rendering spec text or > delete them? Plusses: each img has a @longdesc = exemplifies. Minuses: the img-s are quite big - could have been made smaller. (Some or all of them display more browser chrome than strictly needed.) Ideas: Could the images be edited so that at least each image pair is presented side by side? Then readers see their relationship faster. If you agree to that, then I'd suggest to also add two images for the context-menu example too, where the second image could show a "description window" in front of the main content window. The last example, with 3 images, I would also suggest to have side by side. To present them side by side, you could may be use an ordered list where the list items are inline blocks. Or may be you could use a table. Or - may be the simplest (except that you may then need to arrange the image caption differently) - you can simply place the related IMG elements side by side - it seems the spec treats such images as inline images, so they would be rendered side by side. (I have looked through all the 23 images in the spec - see for instance http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/interactive-elements#dom-details-open - which has two images side by side.) -- Leif H Silli
Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2011 11:11:10 UTC