- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:19:16 +0000
- To: public-html-a11y@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12243 --- Comment #5 from Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> 2011-03-22 18:19:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) Through some off-bugzilla debate, I believe I have some better answers: > As comment 0 states, even the people on the HTML WG (me included) made the > mistake of thinking that this was allowed. Given that the vast majority of the > documents on the web does not pass a HTML validator without errors, I think we > can safely assume adding another error to the validation will leave a vast > majority of documents unaffected. The basis for this bug is the the assumption that idrefs of anchor elements will be *especially* useless to use inside aria-describedby. Texts like "please visit this page" are hardly useful as description of anything inside the page within which the link is situated. So the bug report is not based on the belief that authors will be especially prone to include idrefs of links inside aria-describedby and aria-labelledby. It is instead based on what is likely to be useful to the AT user. Also, I do think that we should at least please avoid that authors get the wrong ideas. It is enough to take @longdesc as example: Had the W3 HTML4 validator had URL valdiation, then misunderstanding that some developed (namely the belive it could contain text) would not have affected the HTMLwg in its work with speccing HTML5. The fact that HTML5 includes URL validation for all *valid* attributes that can take URLs, is a sign which shows that there is faith in performing attribute value validation. Meanwhile, the kind of warning I suggest for aria-describedby is not a normal error warning, but ratheer a "this is probably wrong" kind of warning. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 22 March 2011 18:19:18 UTC