- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 09:28:55 -0600
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Cc: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, HTML WG LIST <public-html@w3.org>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, "jackalmage@gmail.com" <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Hi Leif, Tab's email proposed using "<canvas> over <img longdesc>". >> How did you come to the conclusion it is not a viable solution? > > Viable solution to which problem? > > * Did you mean a "viable replacement-for-<img@longdesc solution"? > If you meant the former, then the reasoning in Laura's change proposal > explains very well why it isn't a viable solution. [1] But if you meant > the latter, then it looks as if it could be a viable solution. Laura's > change proposal is however about the former and not the altter. Hence I > choose to believe that Laura did not express herself about wether it is > a solution to the latter problem. Yes, Leif, I meant, <canvas src> is not viable solution for longdesc. Best Regards, Laura [1] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/InstateLongdesc#.3Ccanvas_src.3E -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Tuesday, 8 March 2011 15:29:27 UTC