- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 10:18:01 +1100
- To: HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Please find the minutes of today's media subgroup meeting at http://www.w3.org/2011/03/02-html-a11y-minutes.html and pasted below. (We somehow don't have zakim know about the conference any longer - if somebody can sort this out, that would be good.) Best Regards, Silvia. - DRAFT - HTML Accessibility Task Force Teleconference 02 Mar 2011 Attendees Present Regrets Chair John Scribe silvia Contents Topics Actions Review http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/track/actions/open Face to Face--Please Register http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/44061/201103_ftf/ Issue-152 Multitrack API http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2011Feb/0079.html Bug 10693 - Need a means for navigating between related timed tracks of media elements Poster Other Business Summary of Action Items <trackbot> Date: 02 March 2011 <scribe> scribe: silvia <scribe> Meeting: HTML-A11Y telecon <scribe> Chair: John_Foliot <scribe> agenda: this Actions Review http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/track/actions/open nothing open other than Janina's item, which continues Face to Face--Please Register http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/44061/201103_ftf/ silvia requested breakout for media JF: ongoing discussions on list will help get towards a resolution on media multitrack api ... we may still need to have final discussions there ... I'll follow up with Mike and Michael Judy: I was not planning to attend, but since we will do intensive media work, I have changed my flights Issue-152 Multitrack API http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2011Feb/0079.html JF: we now have 8 possible options in the wiki silvia: discussions are ongoing … Eric posted the 8th option today, which we are now discussing in detail scribe: Philip was strongly advocating separate elements mostly because or rendering issues ... I think we have to look at the different options as to their different approaches/requirements on rendering next JF: has the CSS working group looked at this Eric: no, but there are probably not many concerns for the CSS WG silvia: I don't think it's a CSS side issue - it's more about how we expose the elements to CSS from the HTML side JF: we'll just keep working on it on list, since we seem to be making progress Bug 10693 - Need a means for navigating between related timed tracks of media elements JF: is there any overlap with Issue-152? silvia: yes, since we do need tracks first before we can specify the navigation between tracks ... I am mostly concerned about the book chapter / article / word kind of navigation (discussion about different technical ways of achieving this) silvia proposes to have the navigation between explicit tracks of the video element sean proposes that the markup could be within the loaded resource within a track JF thinks it would be easier on authors if the different hierarchical navigation levels would be within a single chapter track file plainly we need more on-list discussion JF proposes this issue has to be addressed and solved by CR <SeanH> I suggested that a DAISY NCX file is an existence proof JF: we need to set up a wiki page ... am hoping we can progress this to an issue before May 22nd timeline: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Sep/0074.html ... it is a post-LC bug Judy: it might be worth getting additional input on what is happening after the 22nd May and whether issues will still be addressed after this ... I am interested in how we would progress towards an implementation of this Eric: it is likely to have a fairly large impact on implementation ... we are very far away from being available, since there is a non-trivial amount of implementation necessary JF: so the first non-trivial amount of implementation will be the solution to multitrack API ... I see the navigation as equally important ... I just want to make sure it doesn't slip ... is it realistic that we can work on this once we have finalized the multitrack API Eric: to large amount the issues are orthogonal, but we only have this much bandwidth to deal with spec changes silvia: yes, I would think it makes sense to attack this bug after issue-152 JF: this is an acknowledge issue and we need to get it into the spec - probably before CR Judy: should we bring it other people that can have the time to deal with this issue? Eric: it is important to understand how this issue interacts with all the other issues and we've tried to get other interested to help in this field - I think it's unrealistic to try and bring in new blood and expect them to be faster in solving this than taking the sequential approach JF: there is Mark from Netflix now included also in the multitrack discussion, which is great ... is it realistic to say that this is the next issue we tackle? Judy: we also need to talk with Janina about this Poster JF: let's not discuss this now silvia: as a related issue, I am concerned about non-time-aligned text replacements for video, e.g. short text that is being announced as you tab onto the video ... is this something we need to analyse in a focused way> ? JF: if you can't see it, you need the fallback Eric: it is the same issue whether the poster is an element or not ... this probably needs a bug in the tracker <scribe> ACTION: John register a bug on "all media elements should have short and long text replacements associated with them" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/03/02-html-a11y-minutes.html#action01] <trackbot> Created ACTION-107 - Register a bug on "all media elements should have short and long text replacements associated with them" [on John Foliot - due 2011-03-09]. silvia: note that there is also issue-9 open ... and will be closed today if we don't speak up Sean: are there open change proposals to this issue that would be closed with it? JF: as long as the derivative bugs and issues are not closed, it's probably ok to close issue-9 ... it's probably not the intention of the chairs to close other open issues just because this issue is closed silvia: since we now have derivative bugs, it's probably ok to close it eric: we got more concrete now and are dealing with the individual issues, it would be good to close issue-9 sean: the original multitrack change proposal was against issue-9, but that's mostly accepted now JF: I also think we can take the scaffolding down now Other Business Sean: I've been doing some implementation work on the event model around track API ... the way that cues get added to the cue list, it's impossible to get the handlers in place in time for them to be executed ... it would be good it people looked at this before the F2F silvia: is onchange not sufficient sean: probably not - we need information on the incoming and outgoing cue list ... it it was on the event rather than a list in the element, that would be easier to deal with ... I've created a list around this and would appreciate it being discussed at the F2F JF: is this worthwhile filing it as a bug Sean: I'd like to have a discussion before filing a specific bug JF: let's keep discussing and note that it's something we want to talk about at the F2F No more other business We won't have a meeting on the 16th March Given the F2F for the 19th and there is CSUN But next week will be an active meeting Meeting finished rssagent, make minutes Summary of Action Items [NEW] ACTION: John register a bug on "all media elements should have short and long text replacements associated with them" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/03/02-html-a11y-minutes.html#action01] [End of minutes]
Received on Wednesday, 2 March 2011 23:18:54 UTC